ARC: Analysis & Research

Instutional Effectiveness & Research (IER) partners with the division of Student Affairs to support a comprehensive, ongoing assessment process that evaluates effectiveness of all programs and services using institutional data and development of dashboards. They provide essential information on how the office supports academic advising through comprehensive data analysis and research. It details the office’s role in delivering insights on student success, program effectiveness, and institutional performance. This data-driven approach helps advisors make informed decisions, tailor their guidance, and enhance the overall student experience.

Data & Action Projects

  • Explore institutional and survey data to understand student success trends at 缅北禁地.
  • Analyze assessment results related to student experiences with academic advising.
  • Integrate equity-minded student success frameworks into student advising practices.
  • Develop an action plan to strengthen student advising practices on campus.
  • Collaborate across divisions to strengthen institutional commitment to student success.

Team Members

Luz Calvo, Faculty/Chair, Faculty Lead of GANAS Program

Kevin GinSenior Strategic Partner, Institutional Effectiveness & Research

Paul CarpenterProfessor/Department Chair, Kinesiology 

Christina Chin-Newman, Professor, Human Development & Women's Studies

Shannon CoskranPACE Counselor and Coordinator

Saleem GilmoreDirector, EOP

Shonda GowardDirector, Student Center for Academic Achievement

Bill Irwin, Student Success Specialist, Academic Programs & Services

Jennifer Luna, Director, Recreation & Student Wellbeing

Cherie Randolph, Veterans Retention Program Coordinator

Thomas Tyner, Executive Director, University Extention

Pioneer Pathways: Advising Surveys

Pioneer Pathway - Student Perspectives

View Full Report Here

During spring 2021, 缅北禁地 administered an online advising survey to all enrolled undergraduate students to learn more about their experiences with academic advising. In all, 2,943 students participated, a response rate 24.1% in this voluntary survey over three weeks.

Underrepresented minority students are...

  • More likely to utilize 缅北禁地 Students as a primary source of information
  • Less likely to get referrals to accessibility services and counseling from major advisors.

 Low income students are more likely to...

  • Appreciate support to understand why required courses are important for their academic program.
  • Find information about University Policies and Requirements useful.

 SEAS participants are more likely to report that...

  • Academic support is useful (e.g., improving studying skills, referrals to tutoring, accessbility and counseling).
  • Counselors have been available when needed
  • Counselors respect their identity, culture and well-being

 Traditional college students are more likely to utilize...

  • Faculty in their major/department
  • the College Advising Center
  • the General Studies faculty
  • their Pioneer Success Coach advisor

How do students feel about their advising experience?

At the end of the survey, space was provided for the students to write additional comments. There were a mix of both challenging experiences and positive comments.

"I really appreciate the GE advisors I have communicated with throughout my experience at East Bay so far. They are very hands on and determined to answer any questions and help you succeed."

 What we can do to improve our advising experience?

SHOWING THAT WE CARE

Students want more assurance that advisors see them as a person and are invested in their success. Social-emotional awareness often brought up the survey.

Being more accessible

Students expressed more concerns advisor acessibility. Many students experienced difficulty in getting in contact or scheduling appointments with an advisor.

Reflecting on our knowledge and trainings

Students expressed that more time and attention should be given to ensuring that the information advisors are sharing is accurate.

Pioneer Pathways: Academic Advisor Spring 2021 Survey

View Full Report Here

The survey was sent in Spring 2021 via email to the Academic Advisors listserv. Advisors were invited to take part in the survey anonymously. The survey was hosted by the office of Institutional Effectiveness and Research on the Qualtrics platform. There were 90 recorded responses of 355 individuals who received the survey. This represents a response rate of 25%.